Thursday, April 27, 2017

Modern Revisionist Christianity: How the Devil Diminishes the Divine Nature of Jesus Christ

Today the Salt Lake Tribune published a theological commentary, courtesy of Religion News Service, by a Catholic priest named Roger Vermalen Karban, of Belleville, Illinois. The title of his commentary was “Jesus and the Ordination of Women.”

We took some interest in the article because the vast body of historical records on Jesus Christ, mainly from New Testament scripture, contains absolutely no information indicating that Christ ever ordained women.

But it was not the ordination idea that was most unusual in the commentary by this Catholic writer and theologian. Rather, it was Karban’s idea that the resurrected Christ represents a wholly “new creation” in the sense of Christ’s changed doctrinal understanding, and that the resurrected Christ is now a uniquely different person in his comprehension of all things spiritual--not the same historical Jesus that once lived in mortality among the Jews.

Karban bases his revisionist views of the resurrected Christ on what appears to be his misinterpretation of 2 Corinthians 5:17, which simply states that “…if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature…” What the Apostle Paul more likely meant in this context was that a true follower of Christ is spiritually reborn in terms of his or her own personal conduct, having made decisions to live a righteous, Christ-centered life.

But Karban goes further in his “new creature” interpretation, writing that “the person who rose from the tomb into a new creation on Easter Sunday was just as much a slave as a free person, a Gentile as a Jew, and a woman as a man.”  He construed this idea from Galatians 3:27-28, which actually reads, “For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”

In other words, according to the commentary, Jesus now risen could not be considered the first-century Jewish man, carpenter, and “itinerant preacher” described in the New Testament.

We might more accurately interpret Galatians 3:27-28 as meaning that in the eyes of God, true believers are equally acceptable, and have become unified in their faith in Jesus Christ.

However, as Karban reasons, if Jesus were now both male and female, then surely he would not now refrain from ordaining women in the Catholic Church. According to Korban, this is “because it is now a different Jesus, not a ‘returned’ historical Jesus” as described in the New Testament. “The risen Jesus constantly modifies his message to meet the needs of new times and new audiences,” he writes.

How convenient!  Teachings and practices may now be changed on a whim to meet the “needs of new times and new audiences.”  The doctrines taught by the historical Jesus have no lasting relevancy!

In yet another surprising reinterpretation of scripture, Karban claims that Jesus did not raise Lazarus or the 12-year-old daughter of Jairus from the dead. He states, “Jesus simply resuscitated them.” Thus, he denies, as many non-believers, the power and authority of Jesus Christ to perform such miracles.

Korban retells the story of Paul’s conversion in Acts, chapter 9. But according to Korban, Saul is “knocked to the ground by someone claiming to be Jesus.” And then, “much to Saul's surprise, this confrontative risen Jesus identifies with all his followers,” suggesting somehow that believers both men and women in Damascus represented “other Christs.” From this we are to understand “according to Luke’s theology” that all believers are equally other Christs.

Korban concludes by writing that “just as the church once struggled to surface the risen Jesus in Gentiles and slaves, it continues to struggle with experiencing that same unique (Jesus) person in women.”  The parallels with mistreatment of slaves and discrimination against foreigners are apparent--quite a condemnation of his denomination.

Wow!  Let's now return to some sense of truth: The scriptures are clear that Jesus Christ was the Son of God, born on the earth; He lived a perfect life, taught the gospel, organized his church, atoned for our sins, was crucified, and resurrected as an immortal glorified being--but not as a uniquely different person apart from his historical authenticity. He allowed his disciples to “reach hither thy finger and behold my hands, and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side” (John 20:27) to know with certainty that it was He who was tortured and killed. After his resurrection, He continued to teach his disciples the same gospel doctrines--perfectly consistent with all that He taught them before the resurrection.

The Devil would like people to diminish the historical Jesus of the New Testament as merely a carpenter turned itinerant preacher, and to deny the miracles, and even to suggest the teachings of Christ in scripture are no longer relevant today because the new Jesus is somehow more enlightened to contemporary social issues. Many already do that for the Devil in so-called intellectual, but spiritually hollow commentary.

And incidentally, Peter also raised the dead (Acts 9:41) with the power and authority of Christ. And Jesus Christ didn’t knock Saul to the ground. We need not twist the scriptures or invent a new Jesus, more perfect than the one we already know, to appease popular notions or meet the “needs of new times and new audiences.”

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Salt Lake Tribune Tells Church to Retire “Older, White, Male” General Authorities

A recent article in the Salt Lake Tribune on October 7, 2016, by faith editor Peggy Fletcher Stack, berates a leadership selection and retention system in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints that creates a “gerontocracy” with leaders who are likely “to suffer physical and mental impairments” as they age.

Her article on “Mormon videos spur question:  Should aging LDS apostles be able to retire?” laments a leadership that is old, white, and male, with “almost no women or people of color” in sight. Further, she complains that only “a few non-Americans have inched up the leadership ladder.”

In a statement of astounding self-discovery, the videos, as she reports, provide “stark visual verification of what believers long have known about their faith’s top leaders.”   Yikes!  (This is news?)

Maybe she should take a closer look at the new general authorities chart, which includes men and women, leaders of color from dozens of different countries, and among them noted physicians, dentists, lawyers, business executives, government officials, tradesmen, and other professionals….including a Czech former chief 747 pilot for Lufthansa with an authoritative German accent in the First Presidency!

Oh, Peggy, what were you thinking when you wrote this article??

She continues with “some wonder if an LDS Church president could resign his office—the way Pope Benedict XVI did—and hand the leadership to a younger, more vibrant man.”  (And this is a faith editor who has covered the Church for the Tribune for 25 years--since 1991), yet she seems wholly illiterate on the process by which Church leaders are chosen for each position, from top to bottom, and the high caliber of those leaders, intellectually and spiritually.  What is worse, she negligently disregards the process and the doctrine stated clearly in the Fifth Article of Faith:

“We believe that a man must be called of God, by prophecy, and by the laying on of hands, by those who are in authority, to preach the Gospel and administer in the ordinances thereof.”

Peggy Fletcher Stack conveniently forgets that she covers the Church of Jesus Christ, a church that is led and guided by Jesus of Nazareth through direct revelation.  Directly addressing her topic, Elder David A. Bednar stated that the leaders of this Church are called and chosen of God “by prophecy” and revelation.

“Some people have suggested younger, more vigorous leaders are needed in the Church to address effectively the serious challenges of our modern world.  But the Lord does not use contemporary philosophies and practices of leadership to accomplish His purposes (Isaiah 55:8–9).” (“Chosen to Bear Testimony of My Name,” Ensign, November 2015).

In other words, it isn’t up to Peggy Fletcher Stack or any of her quoted sources, or the news media, or detractors and critics to decide who is called or how long they serve, if they are male or female, black, white, or brown.  In the Church, it is God who selects His leaders for the positions in which they serve.

In his October 2015 General Conference talk, Elder Bednar further stated that we can expect that the President and other senior leaders of the Church will be older and spiritually seasoned men…with human physical frailties as they age and eventually die. The order and process by which they are called and released is “the Lord’s revealed pattern of governance by councils in His Church,” he said.

Peggy quotes Gregory Prince, author of a forthcoming article on the gerontocracy topic, who warns of downsides to reliance on aging authorities. "A power vacuum at the top, caused by the incapacitation of the church president, can put the entire church at risk of damage that might otherwise be prevented by a competent president," he explained.

Power vacuum at the top?  Can put the entire Church at risk?  Looks to us like Gregory Prince has little personal knowledge of Church leadership and how it functions.

She further quotes Gregory Prince as follows:  “The top leader also can step in and settle conflicts between apostles and take actions his counselors feel uncomfortable implementing on their own.”
Conflicts and discomfort?

Notice the disparaging language, as though this problem exists among the leadership.  The harmony, unity, and brotherhood of the Quorum of Twelve Apostles are not mentioned.

Peggy Fletcher Stack quotes Gregory Prince once again, that "service until death is a tradition but not a scripturally based doctrine,” (from “Gerontocracy and the Future of Mormonism," to be published in Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought.)  Au contraire Mr. Prince, do you not understand the doctrine of the Church as it pertains to revelation, the mind and will of God, and the sacred lifetime calling of all apostles since organization of the Original Church of Jesus Christ as given in somewhat fragmentary detail in the New Testament??

In our opinion, the general authorities of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are great men and women, of noble character and enormous leadership ability, who follow the Spirit of the Lord in personal righteousness.  We know many of them personally.

It is easy for others to criticize President Thomas S. Monson for his advanced years and decreasing physical abilities.  But the Lord knows him, and loves him, and he is supported by the strength of his counselors, the Quorum of the Twelve, the Seventy, and thousands of other outstanding leaders, chosen by God, throughout the world in various capacities and callings.

We love the reflection by Elder Bednar from the same conference talk mentioned above: “The limitations that are the natural consequence of advancing age can in fact become remarkable sources of spiritual learning and insight. The very factors many may believe limit the effectiveness of these servants can become some of their greatest strengths.  Physical restrictions can expand vision. Limited stamina can clarify priorities. Inability to do many things can direct focus to a few things of greatest importance.” (Ensign, November 2015, op cit.).  And that is good for the Church.

So, Peggy Fletcher Stack and Gregory Prince, we don’t expect President Monson to resign and retire to a castle in the mountains anytime soon. God will call him home when the time is right.

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

News headlines that you won’t see printed in the Salt Lake Tribune


Background--  The Salt Lake Tribune was established in 1870 as an anti-Mormon, left-liberal alternative to the Church-owned, moderately conservative Deseret News. The Tribune is well-known for its caustic, ever-antagonistic content directed against the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, its leaders, members, institutions, traditions, policies, and doctrines. The Tribune and its supporters thrive on controversy, but only from one side. Consequently, among its headlines, one will never find examples such as these:

- Biblical scholars concur that homosexual acts are “sinful according to scripture”

- Mormon prophet Thomas Monson acts on divine revelation, selects three new apostles

- Intact families with one mom and one dad actually more healthy for children’s well-being and self-esteem

- Navel-plunge necklines and “barely there” gowns look silly on Hollywood starlets

- University psychologists lament societal impacts of personal responsibility, individual choice

- Buyer’s remorse:  post-abortion depression can last for decades

- LDS Church correct to base temple admission solely on personal worthiness, spiritual preparation

- Gay Pride Center of Salt Lake releases bigoted, hurtful comments about Mormon leaders

- Downtown investments in City Creek Mall strengthen local economy, provide jobs, and preserve environment surrounding major historical and religious sites

- Mormons now account for more than 75 percent of all Christian missionaries world-wide 

- Acclaimed Tabernacle choir weekly broadcast:  best overall value in classical entertainment 

- New evidence for Book of Mormon authenticity:  computer word-pattern analysis confirms multiple, ancient authors

- Rapid growth in LDS Church membership necessitates one new chapel every day somewhere in the world

- Mormon intellectual rebaptized, rejunivated by insights gained from Joseph Smith Papers project

- Popular pamphlet “For the Strength of Youth” provides clear guidelines in an “anything-goes,” pop-culture world

- “Home teachers” from Latter-day Saint congregations reach out to less-active members, embrace diversity with Christ-like charity

- Refugees and disaster victims in remote countries saved by Church humanitarian aid shipments

- Hispanics, Blacks, and Native Americans find love, acceptance, and personal fulfillment at Brigham Young University

- “Fierce” Polynesian football players strengthened by two-year LDS mission experience

- Women authorized to perform priesthood ordinances in Mormon temples since 1846, serve with grace and elegance

- Full tithe payers least likely among Utahns to face debt, financial struggles

- Shared printing facilities and joint operating agreement with Deseret News save Trib from bankruptcy

Friday, August 14, 2015

Illumination and Transparency: Further Thoughts on the Seer Stone and Divine Power by which the Book of Mormon was Translated into English

The release of photos of Joseph Smith’s seer stone by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, together with commentary and images of the original hand-written printer’s copy of the Book of Mormon, generated considerable excitement among church members -- as well as ridicule and mockery from anti-Mormon cynics.

Published news articles suggested that the seer stone-in-the-hat and translation method was something of an embarrassment for the Church that had been hidden from everyday members.  To some, the existence of the seer stone is “shocking” or reminiscent of witchery, magic, and the occult.  To others, it is nonsensical make-believe to deceive gullible, blind-faith Mormons. Some have even suggested that the Church is now trying to achieve greater transparency into its peculiar and enigmatic history. 

On further review, however, and when properly understood in light of the documented historical record, the methods that Joseph Smith used were entirely consistent with ancient methods described in the Bible and Book of Mormon.  By providing actual English text, the translation process incorporated several safeguards:  consistent translation to English without the author’s re-interpretation, and exact spellings. 

History also provides insight into methods used by prophets when composing sacred scripture claimed to be the dictated word of God. 

Paul’s second letter to Timothy explained that “All scripture is given by inspiration of God.”  Divine revelation is a basic principle of the Church of Jesus Christ.  Joseph Smith received revelation by personal visits from angels, seeing and hearing the voice of the Lord, mental inspiration, and--for highly complex language and peculiar spelling of names and places--through instruments prepared specifically for divine revelation. 

In our generation, we see nothing strange about turning to a hand-held smart phone or tablet, scanning the internet, taking and transmitting photos, and reading illuminated text from millions of sources connected by the world-wide web.  One may even translate from one language to another using convenient online software tools.  These are marvelous inventions supported by nearly incomprehensible technologies that would have seemed impossible or magical just a few years ago—even in our lifetime.

In ancient days, the Urim and Thummim comprised two white, translucent stones held by wires like spectacles.  This instrument attached to the sacred breastplate, worn by the high priest over the Ephod (an elaborate linen garment).  Looking into the instrument, the prophet inquired of God and received directly inspired answers (Exodus 28:13-30) as illuminated writing in the stones.

Another curious instrument, the Liahona compass (or “interpreters”) was a brass ball with two spindles that pointed directions to Lehi and his family after they left Jerusalem to guide them on their journey through an unknown wilderness (1 Nephi 16:10-11). The Liahona also displayed periodic written instructions from God.  

The Liahona and the Urim and Thummim were among the Book of Mormon artifacts that Joseph Smith said were included at Cumorah in the stone box with the gold plates.  Both instruments worked only for righteous purposes and by power from God. 

The brownish-stripped oval seer stone was a type of Urim and Thummin for direct revelation from God in ways that we cannot fully comprehend or appreciate.   Joseph Smith used both the Urim and Thummin and the seer stone to translate the Book of Mormon. 

But was the recent news about the seer stone really anything new to anyone familiar with Church history and doctrine?  No, because the same seer stone is described many places in Church historical literature.

Common knowledge

As a youth, I read about the seer stone in Mormon Doctrine, 2nd edition (Bruce R. McConkie, pp. 818-819; Salt Lake City: Bookcraft; 1966).  I learned more facts about the translation process in high school seminary and university institute classes. Nothing was particularly secret or hidden. The Foundations of the Restoration Teachers Manual, Lesson 3: The Coming Forth of the Book of Mormon, states:

“…another instrument Joseph Smith used while translating the Book of Mormon was a small oval stone, sometimes referred to as a ‘seer stone,’ that he discovered several years before he obtained the gold plates…The historical account indicates that the Prophet sometimes used the Urim and Thummim and sometimes used the seer stone to translate.”


What about the current status and location of the seer stone?  McConkie and others provided that information as well (Mormon Doctrine. 2nd ed.  Salt Lake City, Utah: Bookcraft, 1966, under the section on Urim and Thummim, with a cross reference to Doctrines of Salvation, compiled by Bruce R. McConkie, Volume 3, p. 225, Salt Lake City, Utah:  Bookcraft, 1954-1956):

“The Prophet also had a seer stone which was separate and distinct from the Urim and Thummim . . . this seer stone is now in the possession of the Church.”
David Whitmer, witness
 to the Book of Mormon
 translation process

Translation process

B. H. Roberts wrote in his Comprehensive History of the Church (Volume 1, Chapter  10, The Coming of Oliver Cowdery—“A Great And Marvelous Work”—Manner of Translating the Book of Mormon): 

“(Martin Harris) said that the Prophet possessed a Seer Stone, by which he was enabled to translate as well as with the Urim and Thummim, and for convenience he sometimes used the Seer Stone.  Martin said further that the Seer Stone differed in appearance entirely from the Urim and Thummim that was obtained with the plates, which were two clear stones set in two rims, very much resembling spectacles, only they were larger.  The Seer Stone referred to here was a chocolate-colored, somewhat egg-shaped stone which the Prophet found while digging a well in company with his brother Hyrum, for a Mr. Clark Chase, near Palmyra, N.Y.  It possessed the qualities of Urim and Thummim, since by means of it—as described above—as well as by means of the Interpreters found with the Nephite record, Joseph was able to translate the characters engraven on the plates.  Martin Harris’ description of the manner of translating while he was an amanuensis to the Prophet is as follows:

“By aid of the Seer Stone, sentences would appear and were read by the Prophet and written by Martin, and when finished he would say ‘written,’ and if correctly written, the sentence would disappear and another appear in its place; but if not written correctly it remained until corrected, so that the translation was just as it was engraven on the plates, precisely in the language then used.”

Without any reference books

If one considers the complex structure and content of the Book of Mormon, together with more than 400 difficult names and places mentioned, (such as Gadiomnah, Amnigaddah, Gidgiddonah, Curelom,  Jeneum, Paanchi , and Zemnarihah), it seems obvious that the utility of a divine tool which conveniently spelled out words a few at a time, helps explain how Joseph Smith and his transcribers were able to complete the translation in a few short weeks--without consulting any reference books or external sources, including the family Bible.  He could look at the plates, turn the leaves, and look at the engraved characters, but he needed some way to know the correct spelling of names and places in English.   According to Noel B. Reynolds in chapter 1 of Book of Mormon Authorship Revisited (Provo, Utah: Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1997):

“Joseph did not write the book; rather, he read it as it was given to him through interpretive instruments such as the seer stone, much like we today would read material off a computer screen.” 

“Joseph dictated without reference to any notes, papers, or even the plates themselves; he relied wholly upon the Urim and Thummim and the seer stone.  Joseph spelled out the strange new Book of Mormon names and other unfamiliar words, and scribes read back to him their transcription to allow him to check for accuracy.  New sessions began without any review of the last transcribed material.” 

"The people closest to the translation process had no doubts that it was divinely directed; in fact, they could not imagine that Joseph was capable of writing such a book on his own.”

Consistency in the historical records

All personal accounts of the translation process provide consistent views.  Among those people closest to Joseph Smith and the translation process were Martin Harris and David Whitmer, both witnesses to the authenticity of the Book of Mormon, the gold plates, and interpreters.   

According to David Whitmer (James H. Hart interview, 1884; see also Royal Skousen’s chapter 4 on Statements from Witnesses of the Translation): 

“During the translation process, the witnesses were able to observe, in open setting, Joseph Smith placing the interpreters (either the Urim and Thummim or the seer stone) in a hat and placing his face into the hat.”

“Sometimes Joseph could not pronounce the words correctly, having had but little education, and if by any means a mistake was made in the copy, the luminous writing would remain until it was corrected.” 

“Every word was distinctly visible even down to every letter.” 

According to Martin Harris (in Edward Stevenson’s 1881 account, also from Skousen’s chapter 4 in Reynolds ):

“By aid of the seer stone, sentences would appear and were read by the Prophet and written by Martin, and when finished he would say, “Written,” and if correctly written, that sentence would disappear and another appear in its place; but if not written correctly it remained until corrected, so that the translation was just as it was engraven on the plates, precisely in the language then used.” 

But translation of the Book of Mormon using the Urim and Thummim and seer stone was not merely a perfunctory process.  Translation required Joseph’s complete concentration of mental faculties and spiritual power to enable the words to appear on the sacred instruments provided by God.

By the gift and power of God

In his Comprehensive History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (6 volumes, 1930, Chapter 10.  Reprinting, Orem, Utah: Sonos Publishing Inc., 1991), B.H. Roberts wrote:

“David Whitmer is more specific on this subject.  After describing the means the Prophet employed to exclude the light from the Seer Stone, he says:  “In the darkness, the spiritual light would shine.  A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and under it was the interpretation in English.  Brother Joseph would read off the English to Oliver Cowdery, who was his principal scribe, and when it was written down and repeated to brother Joseph to see if it was correct, then it would disappear, and another character with the interpretation would appear.  Thus the Book of Mormon was translated by the gift and power of God and not by any power of man.” 

“In his Address to All Believers in Christ, David Whitmer says:  ‘At times when brother Joseph would attempt to translate he would look into the hat in which the stone was placed, [to exclude the light], he found he was spiritually blind and could not translate.  He told us that his mind dwelt too much on earthly things, and various causes would make him incapable of proceeding with the translation.  When in this condition he would go out and pray, and when he became sufficiently humble before God, he could then proceed with the translation.”

Test for authenticity

The original source for David Whitmer’s account referenced by most historians is his “Address to all Believers in Christ, A Witness to the Divine Authenticity of the Book of Mormon,” published at Richmond, Missouri, in 1887.  In that history, Whitmer wrote:

“On one occasion Harris sought to test the genuineness of the prophet’s procedure in the matter of translation, as follows:  “Martin said that after continued translation they would become weary and would go down to the river and exercise in throwing stones out on the river, etc.  While so doing on one occasion, Martin found a stone very much resembling the one used for translating, and on resuming their labors of translation, Martin put in place [of the Seer Stone] the stone that he had found.  He said that the prophet remained silent unusually and intently gazing in darkness, no trace of the usual sentence appearing.  Much surprised, Joseph exclaimed: ‘Martin! What is the matter?  All is as dark as Egypt.’  Martin’s countenance betrayed him, and the prophet asked Martin why he had done so.  Martin said, to stop the mouths of fools, who had told him that the prophet had learned those sentences and was merely repeating them.” 

Answers to questions revealed

Joseph Smith received early revelations using the Urim and Thummim.  Speaking of those early days the Prophet usually says (see History of the Church, vol. 1, pp. 33, 36, 45, 49, and 63):

“I inquired of the Lord through the Urim and Thummim, and obtained the following . . . .”

According to Richard Holzapfel and Jeffery Cottle (Holzapfel, Richard Neitzel, and T. Jeffery Cottle. In  A Window to the Past, Chapter on The Nature of Revelation in the Doctrine and Covenants, Salt Lake City, Utah: Bookcraft, 1993):

“Several revelations were received through the use of divine instruments.  Usually, the instrument was the seer stone or the Urim and Thummim.  This method applies to (Doctrine and Covenants) sections 3, 6-7, 10-11, and 14-17.” 

Under the section on Book of Mormon Translation from The Encyclopedia of Mormonism (Daniel H. Ludlow., ed., New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1992), available online at the website for the BYU Harold B. Lee Library, we find:

“Most reports state that throughout the project Joseph used the “Nephite interpreters” or, for convenience, he would use a seer stone (see CHC 1:128-130).  Both instruments were sometimes called by others the Urim and Thummim.  In 1830, Oliver Cowdery is reported to have testified in court that these tools enabled Joseph “to read in English, the reformed Egyptian characters, which were engraved on the plates” (Benton, Evangelical Magazine and Gospel Advocate 2 [Apr. 9, 1831]:15).  In an 1891 interview, William Smith indicated that when his brother Joseph used the “interpreters”  . . . his hands were left free to hold the plates.”

A personal witness

A report in the Kansas City Journal  of its interview with David Whitmer, June 5, 1881 (also reprinted in “Mormonism,” in the Millenial Star 43:421-423 and 437-439, July 4, 1881), written by a non-Mormon editor, reported the following conversation from an interview with eyewitness David Whitmer: 

[page 437]  “When did you see the plates?”

“It was in the latter part of June, 1829.  Joseph [Smith, Jr.], Oliver Cowdery and myself were together, and the angel showed them to us.  We not only saw the plates of the Book of Mormon, but he also showed us the brass plates of the Book of Ether and many others.  They were shown to us in this way. 

Joseph and Oliver and I were sitting on a log when we were overshadowed by a light more glorious than that of the sun.  In the midst of this light, but a few feet from us, appeared a table upon which were many golden plates, also the sword of Laban and the directors (Liahona).  I saw them as plain as I see you now and distinctly heard the voice of the Lord declaring that the records of the plates of the Book of Mormon were translated by the gift and power of God.”

“Who else saw the plates at this time?”

“No one.  Martin Harris, the other witness, saw them the same day, and the eight witnesses, Christian Whitmer, Hiram Page, Jacob Whitmer, Joseph Smith, Sen., Peter Whitmer, Hyrum Smith, Jno. [John] Whitmer and Samuel H. Smith, saw them next day.”

“Did you see the angel?”

“Yes, he stood before us.  Our testimony as recorded in the Book of Mormon is absolutely true, just as it is written there.” 

(See also:  Preston Nibley, Testimonies of Book of Mormon Witnesses, The Three Witnesses of the Book of Mormon: Life, Character and Testimony, Backman and Perkins, David Whitmer, His Life, Character and Testimony, David Whitmer: Life Sketch.  Source:  Preston Nibley, comp., The Witnesses of the Book of Mormon, Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1958, pp 61-64).

To the members of the Church, Elder Russell M. Nelson of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles wrote in 1993 ("A Treasured Testament," Ensign, July 1993, p.61): 

“Joseph Smith would put the seer stone into a hat, and put his face in the hat, drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light; and in the darkness the spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and on that appeared the writing.  One character at a time would appear, and under it was the interpretation in English. Brother Joseph would read off the English to Oliver Cowdery, who was his principal scribe, and when it was written down and repeated to Brother Joseph to see if it was correct, then it would disappear, and another character with the interpretation would appear.  Thus, the Book of Mormon was translated by the gift and power of God, and not by any power of man.”

And so it is.  The story of the seer stone has been well known and documented since the 1820s—not enshrouded in mystery or veiled in mysticism.  Matters that are spiritual in nature require a spiritual perspective, or as the Apostle Paul wrote to the Corinthians:
  
“But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”  (1 Cor. 2:14)

No shaken-faith syndrome in our household!

--------------------------
Other excellent references:   

Royal Skousen, “Translating the Book of Mormon: Evidence from the Original Manuscript,” in Book of Mormon Authorship Revisited: The Evidence for Ancient Origins, ed. Noel B. Reynolds,Provo, Utah: FARMS, 1997, pp. 61-93.  

Richard L. Bushman, Joseph Smith and the Beginnings of Mormonism, Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1984, pp. 79-114. 

Reynolds, Philip C., ed.  Book of Mormon Commentary Series, ed. by George Reynolds, Janne Sjodahl, and Phillip C. Reynolds, Deseret Book: Salt Lake City, Utah.

Friday, November 2, 2012

Why dads matter

We write a few words about the things in life that matter the most to all humanity. One of these is the essential role of the father in balanced parenting.

Today’s item evolved from ongoing observations that dads get little respect. Out of spite and bitterness, some mothers would even estrange her children from their father.

Decades of research have carefully documented the problems associated with children growing up without fathers.  Despite the obvious, we sometimes hear the news media tout and even advocate for “genderless” or “same-sex” parenting.

Recently, we read a refreshing article by Jenet Jacob Erickson in the Deseret News (October 21, 2012) about scientific research on the important psychological influences of dads on children. Ideas from her article are repeated in this blog.

Erickson described research by Andrea Doucet involving 118 primary caregiver dads, including stay-at-home dads. This research shows conclusively that fathers have a completely different parenting style: To develop normally, children need the masculine parenting style that only a dad can provide.

Doucet concluded that fathers do not "mother," and that's a good thing. Although mothering and fathering have much in common, the father provides persistent, critical differences important to healthy child development.

How do fathers nurture children? To begin with, fathers more often use fun and playfulness to connect with their children. No doubt, many a mother has stood by--holding her breath--while fathers "tickled and tossed" their infants. Yet playfulness and fun are often critical modes of connection with children.

Fathers also more consistently make it a point to get their children outdoors for physical activities, as if they intuitively knew that focusing on physical development was also critical to nurturing. These activities involve risks that mothers might otherwise avoid.

Fathers are also more likely to guide their children in deciding how much risk to take, and then to encourage them in that risk taking—whether on the playground, in schoolwork, or at trying something new. This is the way dads foster independence in everything from children making their own lunches and tying their shoes to doing household chores and making academic decisions.

When fathers respond to children's hurts, they also focus more on fixing the problem than the hurt feeling. This seeming "indifference" to those feelings turns out to be useful, particularly as children grow older. As a result, normal children will then seek out and share things with their dads precisely because of dad’s problem-solving responses.

Psychologically damaged children deprived of a fathers influence avoid talking to and sharing with their dads later in life, and are often highly critical of their dads for perceived shortcomings.

As she evaluated these differences, Doucet wondered if dads just weren't just as "nurturing" as moms. Their behaviors didn't always fit the traditional definition of "holding close and responding sensitively."

But a key part of nurturing also includes the capacity to "let go." It is that careful "letting-go" that fathers are particularly good at—in ways that mothers often are not. These vital contributions by dads underscore the many research findings that when dads are not present, children are more likely to suffer and experience serious psychological dependencies, even into adulthood.

Arguments for the non-essential father may reflect an effort to be more accepting of the reality that many children grow up without their dads. But surely a more effective and compassionate approach to social problems would be to acknowledge the uniquely different contributions of mothers and fathers in their children's lives, then to do whatever we can to ensure that we understand the importance of a father’s contributions to child development.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"My father used to play with my brother and me in the yard.  Mother would come out and say, 'You're tearing up the grass.'    'We're not raising grass,' Dad would reply.  'We're raising boys!' "   
                    -- Harmon Killebrew 

"He didn't tell me how to live; he lived; he lived greatness, and he let me watch him do it."   -- adapted from Clarence Budington Kelland